lift off but not airiborne

I have a flyzone cessna 185 34.5 in that I have never been able to fly. I've checked the balance over and over and I can get it to lift off but that's as far up as it will go I live by airport number 2 and I feel the altitude has something to do with my problem. any advice?

lift off but not airiborne

if you want that airplane to fly, put a brushless system in it. that model was specifically made for sea level
with the 380 motor it currently has. flyzone did make an upgrade motor for it, but still insufficient for this
altitude. I also bought one of these planes when they first came out, it will only fly if you have a super long runway
and let the plane take off by itself, even then it's pretty much a crap shoot, or wait for much cooler weather.

lift off but not airiborne

Did it come with the prop already installed or did you install it?

With some of the smaller electrics you get about 1/2 thrust with the prop backwards. You can almost fly but not quite.

lift off but not airiborne

If you're willing to make the trade-off and have sufficient ground
clearance, often you can get decent performance (but short flight
times) simply by upgrading your prop.

As an example, I have a Parkzone J-3 Cub (brushed). It was my very
first airplane. This plane had horrible performance on the stock 8x4
prop. It simply wouldn't climb at all unless the battery was warm
right off the charger; at best you could hand-launch it and it might
maintain altitude or climb extremely slowly. Forget touch-and-goes;
flying the aircraft was an exercise in frustration using the first
minute of flight to s-l-o-w-l-y climb to a suitable altitude, and then
spending the rest of the flight fighting to maintain altitude while
flying in gentle circles and figure-eights.

I traded out the 8x4 prop for a 9x7 prop. Went from 10-minute
flights to 7-minute flights, the performance was just fine. Still not
"stunning" or "excellent" or even "very good", but "not bad". And it
could take off from the ground instead of requiring a hand launch. Of
course, I also had to replace the $8 brushed motor every 100 flights
or so from that point on.

My suggestion would be to try a larger, higher-pitched prop first
before investing in a brushless system, but plan for shorter flights.
I had hundreds upon hundreds of flights on my Cub (some with the wing
on backwards!) by the time I gave it away... and recently, the student
to whom I gave it away gave it back to me rebuilt in better condition
than I gave it to him! I look forward to some lazy flights at the
park... with a suitable propeller for our altitude.

Regards,
Matt B.
_______________________________________________
UteRC mailing list

http://lists.uterc.org/listinfo.cgi/uterc-uterc.org

lift off but not airiborne

once again I have this same airplane and it is way to heavy for the powerplant that is supplied not at all like the cub that matt is implying

re lift off but not airborne

I've tried the prop both ways, I know what you mean about the thrust. thanks for your comments

re: lift off but not airborne

any info on that brushless motor,esc,transmitter and receiver that would work thanks

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available